Main menu:

Site search

Categories

Archive

While our nation’s budget is scrapped and scraped, vital programs are dismissed as expendable and irrelevant,  from veterans benefits, to our children’s education to our non-existent healthcare (unless of course you have health insurance and then again it’s still unaffordable…..)  

The breathtaking neglect of Katrina, the floods in Iowa and now Missouri, and the many of those once middle class citizens now living with either family members or in their cars? 

Apparently, there remains one priority to our Congress above all else……

US Congress Approves Israel Aid Increase

The US Congress has approved a 170 million dollar increase in security assistance to Israel as part of its new 10-year, 30 billion dollar defense aid commitment to the Jewish state.

The money for Israel was part of a larger supplemental spending bill that included 162 billion dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The legislation gained final approval in a 92-6 Senate vote late Thursday.

America’s pro-Israel lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, welcomed the congressional action, saying it would increase US aid to Israel to 2.55 billion dollars in fiscal year 2009, up from 2.38 billion dollars this year.

“The US commitment to maintaining Israel’s qualitative military edge is the cornerstone of American policy in the region,” AIPAC said in a statement Friday.

The military aid to Israel reflected an increase in value of more than 25 percent, Israel Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has said, describing the package as a considerable improvement and very important element for national security. “ 

—EOE—

 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080627172738.e1…

Rachel 

There have been a series of individuals and events which have opened my eyes to the realities happening in occupied Palestine, and to the horrific actions and policies being implemented by the Israeli government towards the people living there, and as well to those who actively oppose such policies.   

One such individual was Rachel Corrie.

Please watch this short video.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMO-FQwIRiM

Rachel was a 23 year old activist from Washington State who had a promising future ahead.  

From her early years there seemed to be something special about Rachel.  

There also seemed something special about the quality of education she received, which from an early age, focused on important social and environmental issues which seems unfortunately unique compared to the more standard education model taught in our schools today. 

While most young girls are more concerned with Barbies, clothes and make up, Rachel from what I’ve read seemed to have much bigger concerns on her mind.   

I came across a link which showed an older clip of Rachel when she must have been no older than five or six, giving a grade school speech about poverty and how it affects children in other countries.  

Even at such a young age she was eloquent and poised. 

It was apparent that the issue of ending human suffering was a driving force for Rachel all her life.

Rachel at Capital High School, Olympia, WA

When she was 23, Rachel entered the war torn world of occupied Palestine with a hand ful of other activists from the International Solidarity Movement. 

An ISM protest in Gaza against Israel’s shooting of Palestinian children. On the right, Rachel Corrie

When she arrived,  Rachel and the other activists attended two days of training in non-violent resistance and essentially volunteered to protect and block Palestinian homes that were being demolished by the Israeli Defense Forces.    

Rachel Corrie chats with a Palestinian friend, living in a dire situation in Rafah, Gaza.

To listen to Rachel as she was volunteering in occupied Palestine only days before her death, watch the powerful video below:  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3JI-axaRF4

On March 16th, 2003 an Israeli soldier driving a bulldozer two-stories high crushed to death 23-year-old Rachel Corrie. 

According to witnesses and photographic documentation, she was killed intentionally.  

Rachel Corrie stands in front of an Israeli army bulldozer wearing an orange jacket so that she can be easily identified and seen.

Rachel as she stands between an Israeli bulldozer and a Palestinian physician’s house in the southern Gaza town of Rafah.

The Israeli bulldozer ran over her and then backed up, crushing her chest and skull.

Friends try to help Rachel as they wait for transportation to the nearest hospital.  However, she was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital. 

With five other nonviolent human rights defenders, Rachel had been in front of a family home in Palestine, standing in front of the property in hopes of protecting it from being destroyed.  

That day the Palestinian home was not destroyed. 

However the life of Rachel Corrie was destroyed by an Israeli soldier who crushed her under the weight of the bulldozer. 

“Rachel and a handful of others practicing Gandhian nonviolence in the Gaza Strip had been pleading with Israeli soldiers for two hours not to destroy a Palestinian family home. Suddenly, the Israeli bulldozer operator began driving his giant bulldozer toward the home, Rachel sitting in the bulldozer’s path. Witnesses report that she then stood up on the mound of debris and dirt pushed by the bulldozer blade and looked straight at the operator through the window.

He continued, and she was pulled underneath the tractor, its blade crushing her.

He then backed up, running over her again, burying her deeper into the dirt.” 

(www.ifamericansknew.org )

I have been profoundly moved by Rachel’s life, as have thousands of others. 

Her life, and death, have changed me.

I hope Rachel may change you as well.

A quote worth sharing:

“Ironically, Rachel’s killer was granted an honor and privilege few of us will ever know:

He looked directly into the eyes of a humanitarian young woman of utter bravery, deep conviction, and selfless courage.

A person who, when confronted with violence and hatred, refused to strike back to save herself or those she had pledged to protect, but relied instead on the sheer force of her spirit and her firm belief in the sacred principles of International Humanitarian Law.

He saw humanity at its very best.

She was a victim of humanity at its very worst.

Rachel’s body was fragile, no match for a US-supplied armoured Caterpillar bulldozer; it is broken now, her life extinguished.

The goals and visions for which she sacrificed her life, however, are as tough and resilient as was her spirit, and not so easily expunged.

May the tragedy of her death, and the nobility and courage of her life, inspire all High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Conventions to do their sacred duty and halt Israeli impunity.”

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article1259.shtml

 Navigating the Storms….

These are interesting times indeed.  

Certainly as an activist, things can get very interesting. 

Recently one evening after returning from a dinner with friends,  I was going to post something on my website. 

But there was a slight problem. 

My website wasn’t there.

I clicked on the link again. 

Again, no conniespage. 

Hmmm…….so after a few emails to some folks and a little more diligence I was able to retrieve my site, which apparently had been hacked. 

The good news was it wasn’t too much of a problem to get it up and back on track. 

The not so good news was it was both an inconvenience and an invasive act. 

Lately, I along with others have witnessed a sizable share of website hackings (along with Google censorship) aimed primarily at sites posting information and articles pertaining to Israel and Palestine.    

More specifically such websites confronting the abuses and injustices being directed at the Palestinians who continue to be driven from their homes and from their land. 

The past year or so I have found myself more interested in the Palestine/Israel region and have subsequently learned how pivotal it is to us in America in so many aspects. 

I have found how it directly impacts our own US policy (both domestic and international) in profound ways.   

I have also found embarking on such an informational journey doesn’t come without its own set of consequences, as certainly many others have discovered as well.

Since that time, I began to post information pertaining to that region.  

I learned about Rachel Corrie and other peace activists who have been killed by IDF troops in Gaza.  

I learned about situations happening in Gaza which our American press has all but omitted from its coverage.      

I learned there are those who are not pleased with websites and bloggers posting information on our sites regarding the volatile situation and treatment of Palestinians in Gaza. 

There are those who engage in less than ethical forms of behavior in order to delegitimize, marginalize and/or intimidate others from posting information that our media should be covering.  

I have learned the subject of Israel and the treatment of the Palestinians is a precarious one with some of my friends.  

I have been told that I somehow must “hate Israel” for addressing questions and conflicts of interest regarding the AIPAC lobby and our lawmakers in Washington. 

On one occasion I was addressed as being anti-semitic.  

Like I said, these are interesting times. 

With that said, I have also learned that the topic of Israel and Palestine is fraught with emotion for many and that should be honored. 

However, to discourage and intimidate others from discussing any issue, dishonors everyones freedom of speech and ulitmately, the truth.   

xoxo

U.S. Consulate employee dies of heart attack at Israeli checkpoint  

 Mohammed Mousa, 63, who has worked for forty years at the US Consulate in Jerusalem and is an American citizen, died of a heart attack when Israeli soldiers refused to allow him to pass through the checkpoint to work this week.

The incident took place on Tuesday, and the IMEMC has confirmed that the heart attack was directly correlated to the stress of being held at the checkpoint.

Mousa’s family stated that he has recently suffered at the hands of the young Israeli soldiers stationed at the Beit Hanina checkpoint.

Although he has worked in Jerusalem for 40 years, soldiers have been giving him difficulty in passing to work in recent weeks.

Israeli soldiers stationed at checkpoints in the Jerusalem area regularly deny entry to Palestinians holding foreign citizenship and holding all necessary permits to pass.

In addition, there have been multiple incidents of soldiers humiliating and harassing elderly Palestinians, on a nearly daily basis at many checkpoints.

There are currently 750 Israeli military checkpoints throughout the West Bank.

Those at the entrance to Jerusalem have, in the past three years, been turned into full-fledged border crossings, with multiple buildings, turnstiles, metal detectors and full military staff.

http://www.imemc.org/article/55395

Breaking The Taboo Against Women Loving Women

by Peggy Luhrs

Since Persephone was taken from Demeter, patriarchal society has done its best to break the bonds between women.

Patriarchy demands that women give primacy to men.

It implicitly and explicitly forbids woman loving, whether this be the love of one woman for another, for herself, or for her sex.

Understanding the nature, reasons and uses of this taboo leads to an understanding of the centrality of lesbians to any movement to improve the status of women.

I use the example of the Demeter/Persephone myth to underscore the fact that the first bond broken by patriarchy is the mother/daughter bond.

That bond is the emotional basis for women loving women.

All of us first learn love from our mothers, but society has insisted that women deny this bond and give their love exclusively to men.

Lesbians are women who have, among other things, broken these rules.

In this male supremacist world, all things female are devalued.

This is a suicidal course for the race and, indeed, late patriarchy distinguishes itself by its capacity to annihilate not only the human race, but the entire planet.

Mother Earth is an entity perceived as female and therefore routinely subject to rape and abuse.

This global ideology translates on the personal plane to a taboo against woman loving.

First and foremost, women are inculcated with a sense of self-hatred.

Growing up in a world where things male are overvalued and things female undervalued cannot help but leave women feeling like inferior beings.

If a woman somehow escapes this conditioning, the first signs of self-assertion will surely bring her lessons in the selfishness and unacceptability of such behavior.

Organizing with women, as I have for the last fifteen years, has convinced me that the most effective stumbling block to our liberation is the internalized self-hatred that comes from living in a woman-hating world.

If we have such a hard time valuing ourselves, how can we change society’s evaluation of us?

Women constantly put men first in a way men never do for women, no matter how heterosexual they are.

Lesbians break the taboo against women bonding and deny the imperative that a man should be the first interest of every woman.

For this heresy, they are severely punished by the family, state, church, and the priests’ heirs, the psychiatrists.

More subtly, their entire existence is erased in the culture.

They are labeled unnatural (as are spinsters) and they are said to wish to be men.

While lesbians may wish more access to the world (which is considered male), they prefer being women.

We are not to love ourselves; it is selfish for a woman and self-respecting for a man.

We are not to love our sex: that’s strident for a woman and normal for a man.

We are not to love another woman; that is unnatural, perverse and insurrectionary.

Men are not to love other men homosexually either, because that is perceived as playing a female role and therefore degrading.

Lesbianism is the strongest and most overt expression of women bonding we have. The repression of lesbians reflects the degree to which women in general are kept down.

Women are socialized in heterosexuality to insure that they continue to see their work as their natural realm, so that their unpaid work at home will be mystified.

Lesbians contradict this conditioning and challenge the prevailing economic system’s use of women.

Women usually do the housework, even if they work themselves, and are expected to be emotionally supportive of men as well.

Many conversations with women, as well as my own experience, convince me this kind of emotional support is rarely reciprocal.

Lesbians offer this kind of support to each other and can enable themselves and each other to do other work.

Defining women’s role as naturally to serve men is the major reason lesbians are labeled as unnatural.

Virginia Woolf wrote that men wish women to “reflect them back at twice their size.”

Lesbians refuse to do this and are disdained for their refusal.

Whenever women begin to bond, despite their socialization, men have done their best to stem the tide of independent women.

As Carol Smith Rosenberg points out in her book “Disorderly Conduct”: “The years before and after WW I saw women’s greatest professional visibility and political activism …

Neither before nor since have women been so political — and so politically successful.

They battled for Peace, suffrage, child labor and protective labor, for birth control and sexual liberation.”

She then notes, “During these same years, male politicians, aided by male physicians, sex reformers and educators launched a concerted political attack condemning female friendships as lesbian and separate female institutions — educational or political — as breeding places for ‘unnatural’ sexual impulses.

These attacks constituted an integral part of the 1920’s assault on feminists and radicals.”

This is still going on, in ever new and subtle forms.

Few political strategies are as old or effective as Divide and Conquer.

All dominant groups use it to retain power. In a nutshell, this is the basis of the taboo against women bonding.

If women were united, self-affirming, women loving feminists, male supremacy, with its attendant privilege, would quickly collapse.

This is not to blame women for their current status.

Men have used economic sanctions, labeling, and all the power of the church, state and family to police women into their male defined role.

They have used rape and brute force as well.

The forces ranged against us are tremendous and it is a tribute to women’s amazing creativity that we have survived and progressed despite such odds.

The system of heterosexual hegemony is so normative and institutionalized that women often enforce it for men.

This is the saddest and perhaps most effective way of keeping women divided. It is the impetus behind this article.

As a feminist, I know the reasons men wish to label me unnatural and erase my existence.

It is much harder to experience the same treatment from women, when one knows they are acting against their own ultimate self-interest and the selves of all women.

Recently I read the following:

“From the beginning of the women’s movement to the present day, a significant number of homosexual women assumed the leadership in the numerous struggles and … through their energy awakened … the average woman to awareness of their human dignity and rights.

Considering the contributions made to the women’s movement by lesbians for decades, it is amazing that the large and influential organizations of the movement have never lifted a finger to improve the civil rights and social standing of their numerous (lesbian) sisters.”

The date of this quote is 1904!

It could be Vermont and the current ERA struggle, the situation is the same. Lesbians have done so much of the work in the women’s movement and every struggle for women’s rights, yet their sisters have usually not responded in kind and, worse yet, have denied or censured lesbians out of their own fear.

The right is waging a homophobic campaign against the passage of the ERA.

Representing male supremacy, they use the same tactics. Homosexuality is a scapegoat issue, trotted out to obscure their real agenda, which is economic.

The money behind STOP-ERA is right-wing money protecting its interest in the heap labor pool that women provide. This is the real issue that so far neither side has addressed.

Some of the women in the pro-ERA forces are so lesbian-phobic as to give the right a real advantage.

If we are to be beaten with the club of homophobia and our own side holds the same club, are we not aiding and abetting the opposition?

The right functions on fear and the antidote to that is not defensiveness, but courage. I’m proud to be an unnatural, selfish, strident woman.

I recognize those epithets as misogynist censures and tributes to my effectiveness. I’m proud of lesbians.

It takes courage to live a life with so little social support and many economic and social sanctions against it.

Lesbianism represents one way of replacing the woman bond that patriarchy has done its best to destroy. It is a real achievement.

If lesbians can have the courage to live our lives and support the women’s movement, surely our sisters in the fight for women’s rights can have the courage to support lesbians.

http://www.mountainpridemedia.org/oitm/issues/1986/02feb1986/taboo.htm

better late than never…. 

on getting this news out

Top ranked Justine Henin retires from tennis

Justine Henin retired from tennis today, an abrupt ending to a short and successful career in which she won seven Grand Slam singles titles and leaves while ranked No. 1.

The 25-year-old Belgian made the surprising announcement at a news conference, less than two weeks before the start of the French Open.

She has won that clay-court major championship four times, including each of the past three years.

“This is the end of a child’s dream,” said Henin, the first woman to retire from tennis while atop the WTA rankings.

“This is a definitive decision. Those who know me know it is serious.”

Her announcement came a day after one of the greatest female golfers in history said she’s walking away: Annika Sorenstam, owner of 10 major titles and one of six women to complete a career Grand Slam in her sport, is retiring at the end of the season.

Henin, though, won’t have any sort of farewell tour. She is quitting immediately.

“It is a new beginning for me. I feel like I already lived three lives.   I gave the sport all I could and took everything it could give me,” she said.

“I take this decision without the least bit of regrets. It is my life as a woman that starts now.”

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/may/14/sports/spw-henin15

Paralyzed Maria faces uncertain future

An Israeli strike killed her mother, grandmother and her brother, yet IDF is trying to deport Maria back to West Bank where there is no adequate care for her.  

 

By Katya Adler
BBC News, Jerusalem 

Six-year-old Maria Amin from Gaza is putting on a brave face in the hydrotherapy pool.

Two therapists at the Alyn Children’s Hospital in Jerusalem are helping her.

Maria cannot kick her legs or even feel the water she’s floating in.

She is permanently attached to a ventilator.

Maria was paralysed from the neck down by an Israeli rocket attack in May 2006.

Maria’s mother, her grandmother and her brother were killed immediately when the strike hit their car.   

Maria was blown through the car window, suffering severe injuries.

Israeli law denies compensation to victims of what it calls its “acts of war”, but Maria’s story was taken up by local as well as foreign press.

 

“We will not agree to discharge her until we are satisfied she will be adequately cared for elsewhere”
Shirley Mayer
Alyn Children’s Hospital 

Under pressure, Israel’s Defence Ministry has been paying for her rehabilitation treatment at the specialist hospital in Jerusalem.

But now it wants to deport Maria to a Palestinian clinic in the West Bank. Staff at the hospital in Jerusalem are helping Maria to become as independent as she can be.

They are teaching her to use her mouth to work a computer.

 The head of the hospital, Shirley Meyer, doesn’t want to let Maria go.

“Without going into politics - that’s not my role and not my business - my first priority is to make sure my patients receive the care they need,” she says.

“I don’t care where that is, but as far as we know, this is the only hospital in the Middle East that can look after Maria properly.  

“Her case is extremely complicated.

So we will not agree to discharge her until we are satisfied she will be adequately cared for elsewhere.”

Israel’s air strike killed my son and my wife.   All I ask is that they look after my daughter
Hamdi Amin
Maria’s father 

Israel’s Supreme Court will hear Maria’s case at the end of September.

If the country’s Defence Ministry gets its way, Maria will be sent to the Abu Raya Rehabilitation Centre in the West Bank town of Ramallah.

In a statement, the ministry said Maria would fare better in her “natural environment”.

Her father Hamdi is fighting to keep her in Jerusalem.

“It’s a matter of life and death for Maria. 

She can only survive 50 seconds without the ventilator and there are often complications. Here they are experts.

In Ramallah they are not,” he says. “Israel’s air strike killed my son and my wife.  All I ask is that they look after my daughter.”  

Legal objections

Maria’s lawyer, Adi Lustigman, has several objections to the Defence Ministry’s plan: Maria is Gazan and has no family in Ramallah; Abu Raya has not got the experience or equipment to deal with complications such as hers; far less severe cases are sent to the Alyn Hospital in Jerusalem.

Frequent hold-ups at checkpoints between Ramallah and Jerusalem could cost Maria her life. She would not be the first Palestinian to die that way. Israel’s Defence Ministry has offered to send staff from Abu Raya to Jerusalem for training.

It says it will pay for some of Maria’s medical equipment and for her father’s rent in Ramallah for a year.

“But then what?” asks her lawyer. Maria’s paralysis, her frequent infections and fevers, her need for new medical equipment as she gets bigger, are all ongoing.

Everyone involved in Maria’s case says they have her best interests at heart but, like so much else in this conflict, the fate of this Gazan child has become highly politicised.

Maria celebrates her sixth birthday on August 30th.

She says she just wants to lead as normal a life as possible.

 “I want them to give me a home for me and my father and my little brother where I can bathe by myself, get dressed by myself and everything,” she says.

“I want them to make a kitchen so I can cook for my father and my brother whatever they want.

“I would love to go to school.   But first I would have to shower, get dressed and have a school bag.”

Maria’s father is constantly by her side.

He feeds her, cleans her ventilator and brushes her hair.

He even paints her nails, although he knows she will never use her hands again.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6960953.stm

Don’t let those frightened of your voice, steal your right to use it.  

By Remi Kanazi / SOURCE

“Free speech is not without consequence. In the United States, for example, criticism of Israel is tantamount to heresy.

Former US President Jimmy Carter felt a societal backlash last year after the release of his book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, which condemned Israel’s apartheid-style policies in the occupied Palestinian territories.

Consequently, and without foundation, Carter was branded by many in the American press as a one-sided, anti-Semitic propagandist.

Similarly, Harvard professor Stephen Walt and University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer were lambasted for a paper the two co-authored that discussed the power of the Israel lobby and its adverse effect on American policy.

Additionally, Norman Finkelstein, an esteemed professor at Depaul University and author of the bestselling book, The Holocaust Industry, witnessed a McCarthyite-style campaign mounted against him when he came up for tenure.

Finkelstein, the son of Holocaust survivors, has been an outspoken critic of Israel’s human rights abuses and of pro-Israel apologist and Harvard professor, Alan Dershowitz.

Predictably, it was Dershowitz who led the anti-tenure campaign against him; ultimately, Finkelstein was not only denied tenure, but he lost his job at Depaul.

The attacks against Carter, Finkelstein, Walt and Mearsheimer serve as a few well-known examples of the consequences writers and intellectuals face when they breach the line and criticize Israel.

Furthermore, the condemnation writers and intellectuals of Arab descent face are invariably higher than Jews of conscience, former presidents, and highly regarded academics.

As a result, many writers often acquiesce to the demands of the mainstream.

Their self-censorship usually appears in the form of “toning down the message,” be it to please editors or critics—essentially to conform to the reality of purported pragmatism.

Yet, this “pragmatism” is a euphemism for acceptance of a repressive status quo and is analogous to the “necessary” practical thinking that silenced a multitude of commentators during the Oslo years—the supposed time of peace. Unsurprisingly, untold Palestinian suffering followed as a result of increased settlement expansion, land confiscation, checkpoints and seizures, and the ultimate failure of Camp David 2000.

Shying away from perceived controversial matters may help to protect a mainstream career, but the intent of a political analyst should not be to produce works of fiction.

The vast majority of Americans weren’t open to criticism of US policy during the run-up to the war on Iraq, mainly due to the media’s complicity in promoting the war, but criticism was still the appropriate course of action based on the facts, and Americans would have been better off for it today.

A man who combined principle, activism, and human appeal quite masterfully was distinguished educator and commentator, Edward Said. In the realm of academia and Middle East analysis, Said was by no means viewed as the quintessential radical.

Nonetheless, his positions were radical when juxtaposed with “conventional wisdom”: he was a proponent of the one-state solution, an unwavering critic of the Israeli government, and an ardent supporter of the ostensibly controversial right of return.

Said was still heavily criticized throughout his career and endured incessant attacks by his detractors, yet his accessible personality and articulate message kept him relevant.

Sadly, Said’s relative acceptance has been the exception rather than the rule. In recent years, there has been increased emphasis on putative pragmatic dialogue.

However, this accentuation on so-called rational and balanced thinking has proven to be little more than a sinister means to pressure the oppressed to accept the position of the oppressor.

The greatest leaders of the last hundred years didn’t shy away from controversy; they remained persistent, and saw their visions brought to fruition; be they Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, or Mahatma Gandhi.

Nevertheless, one cannot overlook that even paramount figures have been castigated for “overstepping” their boundaries, namely Martin Luther King who was chided for speaking out against the war in Vietnam, imperialism, and social injustices that plagued the US.

This week, Palestinians across the US commemorated 60 years of displacement.

Yet, the lens the Palestinian people are expected to look through under the pragmatist vision is one that sees a dispossessed people as necessary victims for a righteous state to take form.

Unfortunately, waves of writers and commentators continue to adopt this line in fear of retribution, in exchange for nicer houses and comfortable livings, or a combination of both.

That is their free will. Free speech is not without consequence. Nonetheless, losing piece of mind is the only repercussion a writer should fear.”

http://1158munich.blogspot.com/2008/05/when-free-speech-doesnt-come-free.html
~
Remi Kanazi is the editor of the forthcoming anthology of poetry, Poets For Palestine, which can be pre-ordered at
www.PoetsForPalestine.com. Remi can be contacted at remroum@gmail.com.
~

Now I’ll know when to sing Happy Birthday to friends…..

Women’s voices sound less Mariella and more Marilyn during ovulation 

By Steve Connor, Science Editor
Thursday, 1 May 2008

 

A woman’s voice becomes more attractive to both men and women at the point in her monthly cycle when she is at her most fertile, according to a study of vocal changes during ovulation.

If the findings can be replicated, they will add further weight to the theory that women give off subtle and unwitting cues about their fertility as part of an evolutionary battle of the sexes centred on attractiveness and fidelity.

The research also found that men tend to find higher-pitched female voices more attractive: so the idea is that a woman’s voice would sound less like Mariella Frostrup and more like Marilyn Monroe at a certain time of the month. 

could not make this stuff up if I tried………

More at:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/womens-voices-sound-sexier-during-ovulation-818760.html

Israeli and US death squads infesting the world

By Stuart Littlewood*

19 May 2008

Stuart Littlewood considers the increasing use of assassination by the US and Israel, and reports that Israeli murder squads have been authorized to enter “friendly” countries, including Britain, and kill enemies of the racist Jews-only state of Israel.

Some readers will remember the 1969 film, “The Assassination Bureau”, a tongue-in-cheek romp based on Jack London’s unfinished novel.

The setting is the turn of the century a hundred years ago, a fanciful time for regime change and the purging of corrupt monarchs and cruel tyrants.

The bureau’s hit team is for hire provided that Ivan Dragomiloff, founder and mastermind, deems the targeted killing “socially justifiable” and there’s proof of the candidate’s misdeeds.

Eventually, however, the moral rectitude of the enterprise gives way to financial greed, and the day comes when the bureau accepts a mission to eradicate an unnamed but prominent public figure.

The fee is paid in advance, proof supplied, job accepted, then the name is revealed.

The target is Dragomiloff himself.

The Assassination Bureau cannot go back on its word and Dragomiloff finds himself pitted against the killing machine he himself created and perfected.

Assassination is the targeted killing of persons usually for political or ideological (and often insane) motives. This is OK, but not OK.

In 1976, US President Ford issued an Executive Order which was enacted after revelations that the CIA had made several attempts on the life of Cuba’s Fidel Castro.

Henceforth, targeted political killings were outlawed:

“No employee of the United States government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, political assassination.”

Every US president since then has upheld Ford’s prohibition on assassinations –  or somehow got round it.

Carter and Reagan reaffirmed the ban, although it didn’t stop the US bombing Gaddafi’s home in 1986 in the hope of rubbing him out, or the Clinton administration firing cruise missiles at suspected guerrilla camps in Afghanistan in 1998, or Bush instructing the CIA to engage in “lethal covert operations” (based on an intelligence “finding”) to destroy Bin Laden and his Al-Qaeda organization.

Nice and legal, though

White House and CIA lawyers claim that an intelligence “finding” makes a difference because the ban on political assassinations doesn’t apply in wartime.

Hey presto!

The right sort of finding puts everything on a war footing.

They also say that the prohibition won’t prevent the US taking action against terrorists.

And in the wake of 9/11 it won’t stop the United States acting in self-defence.

So, all the US has to do is invent or manufacture a “finding”, label the folk who stand in their way “terrorists” and claim the murder was an act of self-defence in a war situation, and they’re home and dry.

Reports suggest the Bush administration has got together with Israel to establish the legal framework for a new American targeted-assassination policy.

The Israelis, of course, are world experts.

Annoying pockets of resistance to their land-grabs, ethnic cleansing, abductions, illegal settlements and other “criminal” activities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip are answered with the wholesale imposition of specially concocted warfare laws for the benefit of Israel’s “self-defence”, or “homeland security”, but which trample on everyone else’s rights.

This is the sort of chicanery that suits Bush admirably as he presses ahead with his war-without-end on terror.

Israel’s liking for assassination and murder goes way back to pre-state days when such atrocities were practised against Arab and British targets by the Irgun, a thoroughly unpleasant organization that believed political violence and terrorism were legitimate tools for removing obstacles to the Zionist cause and driving the Arabs off their lands.

Assassination became official Israeli policy in 1999 when the military planned “initiated attacks” to stop Yasser Arafat’s militia, the Tanzim, from firing on illegal Jewish settlers in the West Bank and Gaza.

The Israelis demonstrated rare ingenuity in bumping off bomb maker Yahya Ayyesh. In 1996 this master-technician in the art of suicide bombing had been on Israel’s most-wanted list for three years. Shabak (Israel’s secret service) finally tricked a friend into giving Ayyash a booby-trapped mobile phone.

When Ayyash used it, Shabak detonated it.

Earlier this year they excelled themselves again by terminating Hezbollah’s Imad Mughniyeh, “the fox”, with an exploding headrest in his Mitsubishi.

However, their preferred method of assassination is the air strike, which is lazy, lacking in finesse and often messy.

In 2002 Israeli F-16 warplanes bombed the house of Sheikh Salah Shehadeh, the military commander of Hamas, in Gaza City, scandalously killing not just him but at least 11 other Palestinians, including seven children, and wounding 120 others.

In 2004, at the second attempt on Hamas’s spiritual leader, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, wheelchair-bound since the age of 12, and nine innocent bystanders were killed in a helicopter gunship attack.

Yassin had survived an F-16 bomb blast the previous year. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon characterized Yassin as “the mastermind of Palestinian terror” and a “mass murderer”, which was comical coming from the war criminal who ran Israel’s death squad, Unit 101, and was found indirectly responsible for the massacres in the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps.

According to the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem ,231 Palestinians have been assassinated, 385 innocent bystanders murdered and heaven knows how many injured or mutilated by Israel since the second intifada in 2000.

“The use of state assassinations by Israel against Palestinian suspects is undermining the rule of law and fuelling the cycle of violence in the region”, Amnesty International warns.

But this systematic extermination is regarded as “legal and legitimate” by Israel’s attorney-general. “If anyone has committed or is planning to carry out terrorist attacks, he has to be hit.

It is effective, precise and just,” Israeli minister Ephraim Sneh said in 2001, indifferent to the frequent lack of precision, the collateral casualties and the possibility that his information is wrong – and the justice of it.

It’s catching, though.

The US State Department similarly describes its own hits on Al-Qaeda as “legal and necessary”.

But pre-emptive strikes are not America’s only tool.

There’s the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay where hundreds of prisoners of “war”, from 13 years old upwards, are held long-term under inhuman conditions, without “due process” and in flagrant breach of the Geneva Conventions.

Many have now been “rendered” to other countries. It’s a living death and many will actually die in unlawful captivity, victims of a quite different form of assassination.

US Vice-President Dick Cheney told Fox News:

If you’ve got an organization that has plotted or is plotting some kind of suicide bomber attack, for example, and they [the Israelis] have hard evidence of who it is and where they’re located, I think there’s some justification in their trying to protect themselves by pre-empting.

This endorsement gave a welcome boost to Sharon’s accelerated assassination programme. Arafat claimed the Israeli cabinet had approved a plan to kill a large number of leading Palestinians.

Sharon denied it but defended assassinations as a “defensive counter-terrorism measure”.

He said he had sent the Palestinians a list of 100 terrorists the Palestinian Authority must arrest, otherwise Israel would continue to “exercise our right of self-defence”.

We’re told Israeli advisers are now training US special forces in aggressive counter-insurgency methods in Iraq, including the use of assassination squads against guerrilla leaders. Urban warfare specialists are sharing the skills they have honed against Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza in order to help the US set up its own hunter-killer teams.

Israeli death squads here in the UK (and in the US)?

Even more worrying are reports that Israeli death squads have been authorized to enter “friendly” countries and kill those suspected of being a threat to the Jewish state wherever they are hiding.

Targeted killings were pretty much restricted to occupied Palestine but the appointment of a new Mossad director, Meir Dagan, in 2002 changed all that.

Sharon was said to have given his old buddy Dagan a mandate to revive the traditional methods of Mossad, including assassinations abroad, even at the risk to Israel’s bilateral relations.

So our home secretary, the fragrant Jacqui Smith, had better tell us truthfully whether Mossad hoodlums are at this moment prowling the streets of London, Bradford, Glasgow and Manchester snuffing out plotters against their rotten racist regime.

Attending Israel’s 60th birthday celebrations a fawning George “Dubya” Bush bent the knee to his Zionist paymasters and declared that the US was proud to be their “closest ally and best friend in the world”. He told them they had worked tirelessly for peace and fought valiantly for freedom.

“You have built a mighty democracy that will endure forever and can always count on America to stand at its side.”

It must be clear to the rest of the world which side the US commander-in-chief’s bread is buttered.

And addressing the Knesset on the subject of Iran, the Tame Texan said, unaware of the irony:

“Permitting the world’s leading sponsor of terror to possess the world’s deadliest weapon would be an unforgivable betrayal of future generations.”

He went on to liken those who urged negotiations with “terrorists and radicals” to appeasers of the Nazis before World War II, the fool apparently being unable to tell the difference.

Genocidal tyrants, corrupt leaders and bloodthirsty heads of state hankering for global domination and wishing to keep the world in turmoil once again infest the planet.

They are often born and nurtured in the Western democracies the world is told to admire but which are now so corrupt they disgust many right-thinking people.

These menaces can’t be brought to justice in the normal way, so it’s a job for a revived and revamped Assassination Bureau.

Military commanders in the resistance and bomb-making freedom fighters are not the issue.

The people of the world need an instrument to eradicate the low life in high places that threatens humanity.

They need to dispatch those who deal in mega-deaths, who meddle massively where they have no business, who create injustice and who make life miserable for millions.

We all have our wish list. I’ll wager the same target names keep reappearing.

Think of it: a socially-responsible international public riddance service ready to do business with any member of the public who feels himself at war with these evil forces and can put a good case for a slaying before the bureau chief and his panel.

I see long queues forming to enlist the bureau’s help in eliminating the world’s tormentors.

For them there is no hiding place.

The game they started will bite them in the ass. Riddance requests have to be accompanied by a suitable “intelligence finding”, of course.

The work of an Assassination Bureau would be perfectly “legal” and “legitimate”, and most certainly “necessary”.

It would simply follow the precedent set by America and Israel.

Dream on!

http://www.redress.cc/global/slittlewood20080519